CAIN-42 MCPGate

AGENTIC AI 75 · #75

Observational evidence of larger task delegation

OpenAI's Codex research documented parallel-agent use and requests estimated to represent substantial human work.

Last reviewed 2026-11-11

Agentic AI 75 / #75

LIVEMoat 4 · Execution Provenance & AttestationBundle · Runtime Containment & EvidenceStream 4

2026 status: Observational research · Category: Adoption research

The 2026 development

OpenAI's Codex research documented parallel-agent use and requests estimated to represent substantial human work.

The governance gap

Estimated task size is not verified time saved, and adoption is not control. The useful measurement is what was delegated, under what authority, with what result and what rework.

Where CAIN-42 fits: Moat 4 — Execution Provenance & Attestation

Core question: Can we prove what actually happened? Hash-chained, signed records binding decision to execution to observable effect.

Measure the delegated unit, not the anecdote: task, authority, duration, result, rework and reviewer. CAIN's run recorder and metering keep those together so a claim about delegation can be checked.

How the wiring works

  1. Define the delegated unit and its authority.
  2. Record duration, result and rework.
  3. Separate estimated from observed effort.
  4. Publish the measurement method with the result.

What is real today

LIVE A public route in this deployment exercises this mechanism today, within its stated scope.

The recorder produces signed run records on fixed samples. CAIN has not measured customer delegation or time saved.

Component in this repositoryWhat the module says it is
keystone/recorder.pyFLIGHT RECORDER KEYSTONE: a signed, replayable record of everything an agent did, that still verifies after redaction.
cain/metering.pyCAIN Governed Action Usage Metering Engine
cain/worm_export.pyCAIN Trust Fabric - tamper-evident WORM Causal Evidence Fabric (Phase 4)
cain/runtime/fingerprint.pyCAIN Sovereign — Agent Behavioural Fingerprint (Prompt 7, Phase 10).

Descriptions are the first line of each module's own docstring, read without importing it. A module path is a pointer into this repository, not a hosted endpoint. Its existence is checked by the test suite; its status for this use is the label above.

Check it yourself

Commercial package

OfferDelegation Measurement Review
BuyerAgent vendors and enterprise buyers
Price (proposal)$2,500–$5,000 per review
BundleRuntime Containment & Evidence — Contain first, then prove what happened.
Operator streamStream 4 of the 10-stream operator playbook

SOC, incident response, compliance, enterprise IT is the bundle buyer. The entry offer for this bundle is Runtime containment review; signed evidence pack; the range is $2,500–$5,000 per review; $2,000–$10,000 per evidence pack. A price on this page is a proposal, not a validated rate, and no customer is claimed.

Buy this as a product or service

CAIN-A75-075 — Delegation Measurement Review PILOT

A bounded pilot report: up to five scenarios, the relevant library engine or analysis, a written result and the stated limits. Engineering time is quoted per pilot.

Kind: Assessment · Price (proposal): $2,500–$5,000 per review · Lead time: 10 business days.

Open the product page · all 75 products

What this page does not claim

What this page is not. CAIN-42 is not affiliated with, endorsed by, integrated into, or shipped with the organisation named in the 2026 item. The item is public context; the page describes how CAIN-42 would govern that class of capability. No page here claims a customer, a partnership, a certification, a patent, or a production integration. Prices are proposals. Built by a three-person team.

← #74 Broader international mobile-agent deploymentAll 75End of the list